•Archaeologists and geographers have been trying to estimate the pre-Columbian population of the Americas for decades. But this is a very difficult task. When Christopher Columbus set foot on the island now known as San Salvador in the Bahamas on October 12, 1492, he encountered the natives who lived there. In his journal, Columbus described the people who greeted him, who traded with him, and other groups living on nearby islands.
But just a few decades after Columbus’s arrival, the Native Americans, as anthropologist Eric Wolf described them, rapidly declined due to a combination of disease, war, and enslavement.
For centuries, researchers have tried to figure out how many Native Americans lived in the Americas just before the arrival of the European colonists. The answer to this question has remained surprisingly unclear; historical census archives, archaeological sites, and estimates based on the carrying capacity of the semi-arid region have varied widely.
Recent studies of Native American demographics have shown that the population reached a peak several centuries before the arrival of the Europeans. If the Europeans had arrived during this peak period, the history of the continent could have been completely different.
Early estimates
Humans have been living in the Americas for tens of thousands of years, crossing over from the Bering Strait. Archaeological evidence suggests that the first Americans spread rapidly to the new lands they encountered. But there is a great deal of uncertainty about the population during the period between this spread and Columbus’s arrival; estimates for the number of Native Americans living across the isthmus in 1492 ranged from one million to 112 million.
In a statement to Live Science, the Penn State University anthropologist said, “We don’t have good numerical estimates.” “The numbers are all over the place.”
One of the first modern researchers to attempt to quantify the pre-Columbian indigenous population was the anthropologist Dobyns. In one study, Dobyns used estimates of how many people different land types could support and records of epidemics in the 16th century to arrive at an estimated indigenous population of about 112 million — more than 100 times what some earlier experts believed. “In summary, Dobyns filled the land to its maximum carrying capacity, so that all similar lands environmentally were filled with the same number of people,” Milner said. “He also assumed that the epidemic was widespread and universal, which would make sense if the land was full.”
In one study, Milner and geographer Chaplin focused on data from eastern North America; by compiling historical group sizes and the sizes of archaeological settlements, they estimated the location and size of “population communities.” Using this method, their general estimate for eastern U.S. and southeastern Canada was about 1.6 million people. Milner and Chaplin wrote: “Our average estimates suggest that North America, before the dramatic reduction of indigenous populations by European diseases in the early 16th century, contained roughly between 2.8 and 5.7 million people, or ‘best estimate’ of 3.8 million.”
“If you’re going to start calculating specific populations, you have to use measurements that work across regions,” said the researcher, an archaeologist at the University of Wyoming, to Live Science. “Humans produce things that are ubiquitous, because everyone needs to make fire to keep warm and cook.”
Charred wood is one of the main human-made things archaeologists use to date an area with radiocarbon. Radiocarbon data provide a series of dates that suggest the forest fuel was likely used.
In North America, many carbon-14 dates from charred wood, along with animal bones and plant remains from archaeological sites, were recorded in CARD (North American Radiocarbon Data Bank).
In one study, geographer Peros and his co-authors at Bishop’s University mathematically combined the ranges of radiocarbon dates in CARD to produce a single curve that shows how common C-14 dates were at the time. At that time, CARD contained about 25,000 records.
Periods with more people likely produced more material that could be radiocarbon-dated, giving the team an idea of when North America’s population grew rapidly, beginning around 50 B.C. and peaking around A.D. 1150. Before that, the indigenous population was likely declining; this may have been because people were moving into denser settlements, possibly due to increased mortality from diseases such as tuberculosis.
“The 1150 date was a surprising and interesting finding,” Peros told Live Science. “I was expecting that to be around 1500, following the arrival of Europeans.”
In one study, Kelly and his co-authors found a similar peak time. By that time, CARD’s dataset had grown, making the estimates more robust. In the study, the researchers wrote: “Although it was devastated by encounters with Europeans, the indigenous population simply peaked in the 1500s and then declined.” In fact, they found evidence of a slight recovery in the population count just before 1500.
“World population has more than doubled in my lifetime; this has never been seen in human existence,” said Milner. “Environmental scientists are trying to look at what was happening over long time periods to give us a range of possibilities for what might happen in the future. We need to make some conscious decisions about how we manage our landscapes and adapt to these changes.”
아직 댓글이 없습니다